Services
Three ways to work together. Which one you need depends less on what you want the site to look like and more on what's actually going wrong, and that's the hard part to see from the inside. Here's how to tell.
30 minutes, and you keep the three fixes either way.
Websites I've designed, built, and maintained
Start here if
The site was built fast, or built by someone who's gone, or built before the business looked the way it looks now. Every change is a fight. It doesn't reflect what you sell anymore.
A rebuild is the right call when the problem is the structure underneath, not the surface. Strategy, UX, design, and front-end development, handled end to end by one person.
When it isn't the right call: if the site is a few years old, reasonably built, and just slow or invisible in search, you probably don't need to start over. Read the next one first.
Start here if
It loads slowly on mobile. It doesn't show up in search for anything except your company name. Something's wrong and you can't tell whether it's the site, the content, or something underneath both.
This is an audit and then the fixes, prioritized by what will move the business rather than by whatever a tool flags as critical.
When it isn't the right call: if your team can't update the site without calling a developer, or the design itself is working against you, fixing the technical layer won't solve that. That's a rebuild, and I'll tell you so.
Start here if
It's fine. It's just drifting. Plugins go out of date, images get uploaded at full size, a form quietly stops sending, and nobody notices until something breaks or somebody complains.
Monthly care: updates, monitoring, performance, content changes, and steady improvement, with a report each month in plain language.
When it isn't the right call: if the site already has real problems, fix those first. Care keeps a good site good. It isn't a cheap way to rescue a bad one.
The usual path
The usual path is a build and then care. The site launches in good shape and somebody keeps it that way, which is the part most projects skip and the reason so many sites need rebuilding again in three years.
The other common path is an audit first, then an honest conversation about whether a rebuild is really necessary. Often it isn't, and finding that out costs a fraction of the alternative.
Next step
That's what the review is for. Thirty minutes on your site and I'll tell you which of these three you actually need, including if the answer is none of them.
30 minutes, and you keep what I find.
