Improve site performance
Page speed, crawlability, on-page SEO, accessibility and tracking, with the quick wins fixed as part of the audit.
30 minutes, and you keep the three things I'd fix first.
Who it's for
Your site looks fine. It loads slowly on mobile, it doesn't show up in search for anything except your company name, and you're not sure whether the problem is the site, the content, or something underneath both.
You'd rather find out what's wrong before committing to a redesign.
What you get
How quickly your pages load and respond for the people actually visiting your site. A green score in a speed test measures something different, which is how a site can pass one and still feel slow.
Redirects, broken links, and how the site is actually put together underneath the design.
Titles, meta descriptions, heading structure, internal linking and schema markup.
Reviewed properly, with the issues that matter most flagged first rather than a dump of every warning a scanner produces.
Whether what you're measuring reflects what you actually care about.
I do the work rather than hand you a report. Quick wins are fixed during the audit itself.
How it works
Page speed on real user data, technical SEO, accessibility against WCAG 2.2 Level AA, and whether your analytics reflect what you care about.
Ordered by what moves your numbers, not by severity score. A critical warning nobody encounters isn't the first thing to fix.
Handled as part of the audit, so you see movement early rather than waiting for a second engagement.
Bigger items priced from what the audit found. You see what changed and what it did.
Worth knowing up front
Some of it's quick. Other things sit in the theme or the platform underneath, and no amount of configuration will move them.
I'll tell you which is which before you spend anything on it. Finding that out at the end is how these projects go wrong.
Pricing
The audit is a fixed fee. Implementation is quoted from what the audit actually finds, so the scope follows the findings rather than a guess.
You'll know the audit cost up front. If you decide to move forward, you'll get a fixed quote for implementation before any work begins.
Common questions
Most underperforming sites need a fix, not a replacement. That's usually faster, less disruptive, and costs a fraction of a rebuild. The audit tells you which one you're looking at before you commit to either.
I do the work. The quick wins get fixed as part of the audit. The bigger items get quoted from what I find, so you're not paying up front for work your site might not need.
I'll tell you, rather than sell you a rebuild you don't need. A short list is a good outcome and it costs you less.
Yes. I work on websites built in WordPress or Webflow. Knowing nothing about the history is part of why an outside audit is useful.
Next step
I'll go through your site before we talk and send you the three things I'd fix first, whether or not we end up working together.
30 minutes. You keep what I find.
